Axiom Tutoring

Tutor for Math, CompSci, Stats, Logic

Professional tutoring service offering individualized, private instruction for high school and college students.  Well qualified and experienced professional with an advanced degree from Columbia University.  Advanced/college mathematics, logic, philosophy, test prep, microeconomics, computer science and more.

Counting in Two Ways

In the study of combinatorics we often encounter the following foundational principle: If you can count the elements of a set in two different ways, producing two different formulae, then those two formulae are equal to each other.


An example: Suppose that you take the set {1,2,3,4} and you want to count the subsets of size two. To be clear, here are the subsets of size two listed in brute-force.

{1,2}, {1,3}, {1,4}, {2,3}, {2,4}, {3,4}

So we can see already that the answer is "There are six of them." But let's count this in a principled way.


If you have a set {1, 2, ..., n}, how many ways are there to select a subset of size 2?

One way to count this is to count all possible pairs. There are \( n\cdot (n-1) \) pairs. This comes from picking a first element, where there are n choices, then picking a second element, where there are n-1 choices because one choice has been removed.

Every subset of two elements, like for instance {2, 3}, corresponds to two pairs like (2,3) and (3,2). Therefore the number of subsets of two elements is $$ \frac{n(n-1)}{2} $$

On the other hand we could have counted this in a different way. You could first pick 1 and then find all two-element subsetes with some other element. There are n-1 of these. Next pick 2 and then find all two-element subsets with some element other than 2 or 1. There are n-2 of these. And so on. Therefore the number of subsets is $$ \sum_{k=1}^n (n-k) $$

Therefore since these two formulae count the same set, then we have proved $$ \frac{n(n-1)}{2} = \sum_{k=1}^n (n-k) $$


Sometimes it is remarked that this interesting as a proof technique in mathematics. But I would propose that EVERY equality works in a basically similar way. We always have some quantity expressed in two different ways, so that they must be equal! Even $$ x=1-1/x$$ expresses one quantity in two different ways. But it is the sameness of the quantity which justifies writing the equation in the first place.